The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Local News

November 17, 2007

DNR responds to critics concerned about CAFO

By Wally Kennedy

wkennedy@joplinglobe.com

The Missouri Department of Natural Resources, in response to citizen concerns about the hog CAFO near Arrow Rock, held a meeting on July 19 to receive public comments about the permit application for the project.

The department, noting that some of the public comments fell outside of the authority of the Clean Water Commission, offered these responses to some of the comments:

n Under Missouri law, the hog CAFO would be classified as a Class 1C CAFO. The DNR said it is not authorized by law to require any odor-control systems.

n Most comments objected to the location of the CAFO in relation to Arrow Rock. The department said it does not have the authority to determine the appropriate site placement or mandate that a site move to a new location. The department does not have zoning authority, nor does the department enforce local zoning requirements.

n Many comments indicated concern about odors. The proposed CAFO has complied with the minimum 1,000-foot buffer zone between the confinement and manure buildings and neighboring residences as required by law. It is the only issue concerning odor that falls under the jurisdiction of the Clean Water Commission.

n Many comments expressed concern about the amount of water the CAFO will draw from the ground. The DNR said Missouri is a riparian-rights state and that water usage from groundwater is largely unregulated. There are no state laws, rules or regulations that address well interference. Typically, such matters are settled in civil court by lawsuit.

n Comments concerning health and the use of antibiotics and hormones were expressed. The DNR said the issues are not regulated under the Missouri Clean Water Law.

n Comments concerning the application of manure to the land were received. The DNR said the permit application includes more than 1,000 acres of cropland available for land application. The DNR said ample land is available for land application.

n Comments were received on the impact to property values. The DNR said it is aware of the “potential consequences” that CAFOs have on property values. The issue, however, is not regulated under the Missouri Clean Water Law.

n Comments were received regarding the fact the owner of the CAFO will not live on-site and that some of the profits would be returned to out-of-state investors. The DNR said it has not authority to control those issues.

Text Only
Local News
Sports
Facebook
Poll

Joplin City Manager Mark Rohr wants the city to distribute weather radios to all Joplin homes that don’t have one. That’s 11,000 radios. Do you think that’s a good use of $300,440?

Yes.
No.
     View Results
Opinion
Business
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Follow me on Twitter
NDN Video
Obama Scraps Birth Control Mandate US Airmen's Killer Sentenced to Life in Germany Raw Video: Deadly Blasts in Syria Romney Slams President Obama at CPAC Gingrich: Pres. Obama 'waging War on Religion' Navy Names Ship for Gabrielle Giffords 5 Killed in Wrong-way Crash on I-10 in La. Denver's Largest-Ever Drug Bust Nets Dozens Marines: No Punishment for Nazi-like Flag Vets Look to Translate Military Skills Into Jobs Raw Video: School Bus Burst Into Flames LA School Reopens Amid Sex Abuse Scandal $25B Settlement Reached Over Foreclosure Abuses Pentagon: Allow Women Closer to Front Lines LA School in Sex Abuse Scandal Reopens Raw Video: Italy's Mount Etna Bursts Into Life Greeks March; Angry Despite Debt Deal Air Force Airlines: Leaders Get Polished Service Ga Girl Fights Off Kidnapper at Walmart Skip the Coffee Cup and Inhale Your Caffeine Fix
House Ads