The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Local News

November 15, 2011

Mo. Supreme Court upholds strip club restrictions

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Missouri strip clubs and other sexually themed businesses must abide by a 2010 state law that banned nudity, alcohol and touching between scantily clad employees and customers, the state Supreme Court ruled Tuesday.

The court in a unanimous decision rejected claims from the adult entertainment industry that Missouri’s law infringed on free expression rights and was passed in violation of legislative procedures. Instead, it ruled that legislators justifiably cited public health, welfare and safety concerns in restricting the operation of such businesses.

The ruling marked a long-sought victory for conservative lawmakers, who have tried for years to limit the sexually themed businesses that have proliferated along the state’s main highways and in some cities. The state Supreme Court struck down a similar 2005 state law because it was attached to an unrelated bill about drunken driving.

As a result Tuesday’s ruling, “Missouri now retains one of the toughest and most comprehensive laws regulating sex shops and strip clubs of any state in the nation,” Joe Ortwerth, executive director of the Missouri Family Policy Council, said in an email to supporters. He added: “We praise God for this tremendous victory.”

Dick Bryant, an attorney for the affected business owners and employees who challenged the law, said he was considering an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

“We believe the decision is a major erosion of rights of free expression afforded under the constitutions of Missouri and the United States,” he said in an email to The Associated Press.

The 41-page opinion by the state Supreme Court affirms the decision of a Cole County judge, who had refused a request to block the law from taking effect on Aug. 28, 2010.

The Missouri law applies to strip clubs, adult video and book stores and other businesses of a sexual nature. It bans full nudity, alcohol, anyone younger than 18 and touching between semi-nude employees and customers. To ensure strippers are off-limits, the law requires semi-nude employees to remain on a stage at least 18 inches high and at least 6 feet from customers. The law also requires sexually oriented businesses to stay closed between midnight and 6 a.m., and it prohibits closed-door viewing booths for pornographic movies, requiring that patrons remain within the clear view of employees.

The state Supreme Court rejected the lawsuit’s contention that the restrictions were aimed at free speech. Instead, the court cited wording from the legislation stating that the restrictions were intended to promote the health, safety and general welfare of the public by limiting the negative societal effects associated with such businesses, including crime, prostitution, the spread of diseases, drug use and urban blight.

Former state Rep. Ed Emery, who handled the bill in the House, said lawmakers carefully crafted its preamble with the goal of surviving a court challenge. He was pleased to hear they succeeded.

“The research that had gone into the preparation of that bill assured that it would be constitutional, but in this day and age you just never know until the ruling comes down,” said Emery, a Republican from Lamar.

The high court rejected the adult entertainment industry’s assertion that the state had to show that negative effects were more common at their businesses than at other places. To the contrary, the court said the plaintiffs failed to produce evidence directly casting doubt on lawmakers’ contention that banning things such as nudity and touching promotes public health and safety.

Some owners of the affected businesses have complained that the law harms them financially and could force them to close. But the state Supreme Court said that was no reason to strike down the law.

“To the extent that the no-touch, six-foot buffer, alcohol ban and open-booth restrictions reduce patronage at sexually oriented businesses, it is not because the restrictions unduly reduce speech, but because they reduce the very types of secondary effects that the government is entitled to and intends to reduce,” Judge Laura Denvir Stith wrote.

The Supreme Court also rejected an argument that the Legislature violated the state constitution because a particular committee did not hold a hearing on a lawmaker’s challenge to the bill’s cost estimate. The court said the constitution only requires the committee to be established and meet and does not provide any basis to strike down a law because of a procedural error.

Text Only
Local News
  • Pseudoephedrine sales in Pittsburg to require prescription

    Starting Friday, those who purchase pseudoephedrine and related products in Pittsburg will need a prescription to do so.

    July 22, 2014

  • Cherokee County Commission accepts general counsel's resignation

    Kevin Cure, who has served as general counsel for the Cherokee County Commission since 2005, submitted a handwritten resignation to the board on Monday in the aftermath of a landfill controversy.

    July 22, 2014

  • Mike Pound 2010.jpg Mike Pound: Parents can get help with school supplies

    I don’t know much about demographics other than the fact that I no longer belong to a “targeted demographic.” When I was younger, I was bombarded by commercials and ads from companies that were trying to sell me things that I not only needed but wanted.

    July 22, 2014 1 Photo

  • Jasper County Commission reviews traffic plans

    The Jasper County Commission will hold public hearings today and Thursday on a number of traffic changes proposed in the county. No one spoke when the first hearing was held Tuesday as part of the regular commission meeting, according to Jim Honey, Eastern District associate commissioner.

    July 22, 2014

  • Joplin school board reviews audit procedures

    A team from the Missouri State Auditor’s Office has begun requesting documents in its task to audit the operations and management of the Joplin School District, the audit manager told the Board of Education on Tuesday.

    July 22, 2014

  • Joplin man to stand trial in accident case

    A passenger accused of causing an accident on Interstate 44 in Joplin that injured three others as well as himself was ordered bound over for trial Tuesday on three felony counts.

    July 22, 2014

  • r072214soroptimist3.jpg Volunteers spend week providing camp experience to foster youths

    Karen McGlamery is a massage therapist. Terri Falis-Cochran is a finance manager. Jane McCaulley is a retired art teacher. But for a week each summer, the three are among dozens of area residents who become camp counselors.

    July 22, 2014 2 Photos

  • Neosho school board hires company to manage substitutes

    Citing its hopes of shifting health care costs and utilizing more time from retired teachers, the Neosho Board of Education granted a contract Monday to a temporary employee company to manage its substitute teacher program.

    July 22, 2014

  • Main Street TIF district study to begin

    A measure that allows the city to charge its $15,000 in administrative costs for studying a proposal to create a tax increment financing district on South Main Street was approved Monday by the Joplin City Council.

    July 21, 2014

  • Carthage man pleads guilty in sexual abuse case

    A Carthage man pleaded guilty Monday to sexual abuse of a 12-year-old girl in a plea agreement that would cap the length of his prison term at no more than 15 years.

    July 21, 2014

Must Read


A state lawmaker who is one of two doctors in the Oklahoma Legislature is insisting that unaccompanied immigrant minors being housed at Fort Sill be quarantined. Do you think those kinds of measures should be taken?

A. Yes.
B. No.
     View Results
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter