The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Local News

July 2, 2012

Council authorizes master developer agreement

JOPLIN, Mo. — Joplin’s work with a Texas firm to redevelop the city won unanimous approval Monday night from the City Council.

“This means the city is taking the next step in rebuilding and redeveloping” from 2011’s historic tornado, said Mayor Melodee Colbert-Kean after the meeting.

“I think it’s a historic night in Joplin,” said City Manager Mark Rohr. “It’s one of the best opportunities I think we’ve ever seen, and I look forward to next Monday night.”

Wallace Bajjali Development Partners, of Sugar Land, Texas, at a work session of the council next Monday will outline $800 million worth of proposals ranging from housing construction to a performing arts complex.

“We’re pleased with the confidence bestowed in Wallace Bajjali,” said David Wallace, the firm’s president, after the council’s decision, adding that the firm looks forward to making the presentation of its initial plan next week.

Asked when he will start holding public forums on the proposals, Wallace said the council will be called on at its next regular meeting, set for July 16, to make some funding decisions that would allow the development firm to proceed with its work. Then the developer will start holding public input sessions to present its ideas to residents.

The mayor said she thinks residents will support the projects.

“Once the community has seen them, I think they’ll be excited about it,” she said.

In discussion about the contract during the meeting, City Attorney Brian Head said it sets out a general structure for the partnership between the firm and the city, but that there will be contracts on each individual project that will establish the details.

The pact grants Wallace Bajjali exclusive development rights unless another developer creates a project that does not require any city incentives or is not similar to any of those proposed by the firm.

The city will pay half of the certified costs of pursuing projects, with a cap of $1 million, Head said. The city will specify what costs are allowed, and the costs will have to be documented. The firm also will pay up to $1 million of those costs.

An early termination clause that would penalize the city for pulling out of the contract in the first five years without cause drew council debate. The penalty for ending the contract in one year is set at $5 million. It decreases by $1 million each successive year.

“Aren’t the termination costs excessive?” asked Councilman Bill Scearce. He said he thought the amount of the penalties boxed the council into a corner if the panel did not want to proceed during those early years.

Rohr said he and Wallace negotiated the termination penalty clause after Head and the Wallace Bajjali attorney reached an impasse on whether to set an expiration on the contract. The developer did not want a specified duration, but Head said he insisted that there be a way to end the partnership. It can be terminated without penalty if there is cause.

Head said the firm’s development fee is set at 5.75 percent of the projects, and that Wallace Bajjali must determine how to derive that fee from the project’s investors. Tax money such as Community Development Block Grants can be allocated to finance projects but cannot be used to pay the developer for services, the council was told.

In other action, the council granted commercial zoning for a 44-acre tract of land at 44th Street and Connecticut Avenue to be developed by Leawood resident David Powell.

The request to designate the land as C-3-PD drew opposition from several Leawood residents, who objected to commercial development near their village.

C-3 zoning allows many types of heavy commercial use that the city staff does not favor for the site, city planner Troy Bolander told the council. He recommended C-2-PD.

Powell told the council that he has clients who are interested in building a nursing home on the east 20 acres of the land and medical offices on the remainder.

Councilman Morris Glaze pointed out that the city’s zoning code does not allow nursing homes in areas zoned C-2. Powell said he would agree to lesser zoning of C-1 on that part of the tract.

The council approved C-1-PD zoning for the eastern section and C-2-PD for the rest of the land. The designation as a planned district will require that landscaping buffers be constructed to reduce the impact on neighboring houses.

Street name

A LANE TO BE CONSTRUCTED around the campus of the new Mercy Hospital being built at 50th Street and Hearnes Boulevard will be named Mercy Way as the result of council authorization Monday night.

Text Only
Local News
  • r073114rebuildjoplin3.jpg 30 volunteers a day would be a ‘game-changer’ for Rebuild Joplin

    Betty and Louis Wirick, both 79, say they are grateful to have survived the 2011 tornado as it tore down part of their home of 25 years on South Bird Avenue. But three years later, they are frustrated.

    July 31, 2014 2 Photos

  • Event for veterans on tap at Crowder

    For area veterans who have returned home from more than a decade at war, the Veterans Health Care System of the Ozarks hopes to send a simple message at an event this weekend: Welcome home.

    August 1, 2014

  • Fair to feature goats, chickens and decorated bras

    Along with the usual fair sights, sounds and smells — livestock, poultry, produce and the like — there will be something a bit unusual at the Cherokee County American Legion Free Fair this year: Decorated brassieres. And pink. Lots of pink.

    August 1, 2014

  • Damien D Doxley 051314.jpg Prison term meted out in carjacking case

    A Newton County judge assessed a defendant in a Joplin carjacking case seven years in prison Friday on a conviction on a charge of tampering with a motor vehicle.

    August 1, 2014 1 Photo

  • 080114 Older worker1_72.jpg Co-workers, friends honor nurse with 50-year career

    Wilma Massey has worked a half century in health care and, even at the age of 74, she’s the first to arrive at work each morning.

    August 1, 2014 2 Photos

  • Amendment 7 backers tout safety, new jobs; foes say special interests to benefit

    Billions of dollars are on the line when Missouri voters head to the polls on Tuesday to consider Amendment 7.
    The constitutional amendment, sent to the voters by the Legislature this year, would temporarily increase Missouri’s sales tax by three-quarters of 1 percent, raising an estimated $5.4 billion for the next decade to fund transportation projects. That includes more than $114.1 million in state funds for projects in Newton and Jasper counties, on top of additional revenue for localities that would be raised.
    After the Missouri Department of Transportation downsized in recent years, these projects are now mostly designed and built by private engineers, contractors and laborers — many of whom have contributed tens of thousands of dollars to a campaign effort to sway voters to support the measure.
    Last Monday — eight days ahead of the primary election day — supporters of the measure reported having raised more than $4.1 million for a campaign committee called Missourians For Safe Transportation and New Jobs, which was established last fall to support the measure.
    The International Union of Operating Engineers in St. Louis and Kansas City have contributed nearly $250,000 to the effort. That total was dwarfed by the $649,398 put in by the Industry Advancement Fund Heavy Constructors. Between its Missouri and Kansas companies, APAC — a construction contracting company that specializes in transportation projects — has contributed more than $150,000.
    “The whole idea that money is flowing into the campaign, of course it is,” said Sen. John Lamping, a St. Louis Republican who is opposed to the measure. “It would be a smart business decision to do that.”
    Lamping said the money pouring into the campaign supporting Amendment 7 is indicative of the financial gain the measure bodes for contractors and laborers.  
    Lamping proposed a measure in the Legislature that would redirect one-eighth of existing sales and use tax revenue directly to transportation projects, but he said that measure was rejected by legislative leaders. The coalition “didn’t hear about it,” the outgoing senator said, “because it was my idea instead of someone else’s idea.”
    Lamping, who filibustered a similar measure in 2013, said Republicans have an ideological consistency problem on the issue. He pointed to the Legislature passing a sales tax increase only a few weeks after overriding Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon’s veto of an income tax cut that will largely help businesses organized as limited liability corporations, like many of the companies that could benefit from the measure. Lamping said that the tax increase will mostly affect taxpayers who did not get a significant tax cut.
    “Who wants a tax cut in Missouri?” he said. “Businesses. (Republican leaders) wanted to make them happy and then they passed a tax cut. This is grand-scale special interest cronyism.”
    The ad campaign being funded mostly by the business interests features paramedics and construction workers claiming the measure would “fix our roads and keep Missouri families safe.”
    “We have a chance to give our highways and bridges the repairs they need,” says one ad, which is running in Joplin and statewide in the lead up to Tuesday’s vote. “We have a chance to fix what’s broken by voting yes on Amendment 7.”
    The commercial uses a lot of words to talk about the benefits of the measure, but two words in particular are noticeably absent from the commercial: “Tax increase.”  
    “The ads don’t mention any of the ballot language,” said Jewell Patek, a spokesman for Missourians For Safe Transportation and New Jobs. “We figure Missourians will see the language when they go to the polls.”
    Patek, a former state representative who now lobbies the Legislature, said he disagreed with Lamping’s notion that Amendment 7 is all about special interest gain.
    “There’s quite a bit to gain for Missourians,” he said. “We have serious road needs. We’ll win or lose by the benefits in Amendment 7. I’m not sure I agree with Senator Lamping’s assessment.”
    If approved, Amendment 7 would prevent an increase in the state’s fuel tax, a funding boost opponents of the amendment like Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon and some of the state’s social welfare groups have said would be more appropriate because it could pull in revenue from people who use the roads — like the state’s trucking industry.
    The Missouri Truckers Association’s political action committee has contributed more than $27,000 to the effort to pass the measure. Tom Crawford, president of the association, said his members support the amendment because they see the problems on the road and deal with them every day. And passage of the measure does not mean anyone will stop paying fuel tax.
    “We overpay our fair share on the fuel tax,” he said, pointing to statistics by the American Transportation Research Institute that show truckers have accounted for about 14 percent of road usage while paying for 39 percent of all taxes and fees owed by motorists. “We pay sales taxes just like everybody does on goods and products that people buy in the stores.”
    Crawford said truck companies do not pay state sales taxes on the purchase of trucks, but they do pay a federal tax. “So, we won’t be impacted on new equipment purchase, but other areas of our business will be impacted just like every other taxpayer in the state will,” he said.
    Thomas Shrout, who is helping lead the campaign against the tax hike, said that is not good enough and that Amendment 7 lets truck drivers off the hook. “Under Amendment 7, they wouldn’t have to pay any more,” he said.
    Shrout’s opposition campaign has raised just over $27,000 — less than 1 percent of the total money raised by its supporters. They are targeting their opposition at the state’s urban core by spending money on direct mail and targeted robocalls in the final week.
    “We think using the sales tax to fund road projects is poor policy for the state of Missouri,” he said. “It should be rejected.”
    Shrout said the Missouri Department of Transportation and its supporters should go back to the drawing board and consider some of the other options like campaigning for toll roads or a gas tax increase — both based on road usage.
    Representatives for APAC and the Heavy Constructors Association declined requests for comment.

    Tuesday’s election
    Amendment 7 is one of five measures voters will consider when they head to the polls on Tuesday. Statewide, local election officials reported to the Missouri secretary of state that it was their estimate that about 27 percent of the state’s 4.06 million registered voters will show up to vote, including 25 percent of registered voters in Jasper County and 30 percent in Newton County.

    August 1, 2014

  • Brownback names 3 Kansas Board of Regents members

    Gov. Sam Brownback on Friday named a former veteran Kansas House member and two attorneys to the board overseeing the state’s higher education system.

    August 1, 2014

  • Grant to fund solar energy system for PSU’s Plaster Center

    An $80,000 grant from Westar Energy will fund solar panels to provide both energy and education at the Robert W. Plaster Center, now under construction at Pittsburg State University.

    August 1, 2014

  • Survey seeks views on Joplin’s future goals

    Residents are being asked to fill out a survey on priorities for Joplin’s future. The effort was inspired by a meeting of community leaders last month. Survey forms are available at the Joplin Public Library and online at

    July 31, 2014

  • Habitat slates volunteer work days

    In the wake of the 2011 tornado, Joplin Area Habitat for Humanity has been a partner with organizations and individuals in the construction of 86 new houses. But what’s also needed, Executive Director Scott Clayton said, are repairs to area homes.

    July 31, 2014

Must Read


Do you plan on voting in the Aug. 5 elections being held in Missouri and Kansas?

     View Results
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter