WASHINGTON —
The Supreme Court rejected a constitutional challenge to New York City’s famed rent-control ordinance, a post-World War II housing measure that limits the rents of more than a million apartments.
The court’s refusal Monday to hear the case is a setback for property-rights activists, who had hoped a more conservative court would protect landlords and a free market in rentals. For decades, critics have said rent-control laws deny property owners the right to fully profit from their investment.
But the high court has been reluctant to second-guess zoning or property regulations unless they deny the owner all use of his land.
The justices, four of whom grew up in New York City, turned away an appeal from James and Jeanne Harmon, who own a five-story brownstone building on West 76th Street in Manhattan. The couple say they have no choice but to rent three apartments on the upper floors for less than half of their market value. They also say that one of their long-time tenants can pay a $1,500-a-month mortgage on a Long Island house because he pays only $951 a month to rent a unit in Harmon’s building.
In his appeal, James Harmon said the rent control law violated the Fifth Amendment, which says “private property (shall not) be taken for public use without just compensation.”
“Contrary to the popular myth, the Rent Stabilization Law is not targeted to help the needy,” James Harmon wrote, representing himself in his appeal to the high court. “A person could make millions of dollars annually and still qualify for a rent-stabilized apartment. It is all about luck, a racket in which property owners and market rate tenants always lose.”
He also noted that the former chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., had four rent-stabilized apartments in the city.
City officials denied that the benefits of rent control go mostly to those who are well off. Instead, they said the persistent shortage of affordable housing gives landlords undue leverage to charge exorbitant rents. By limiting the annual rise in rents, the “rent stabilization” ordinance permits middle-class residents to continue living in the city, they said.
The U.S. appeals court in Manhattan ruled against Harmon last year and said rent regulation is not a “taking” of private property. It takes the votes of four justices to grant an appeal. Without comment Monday, the court said it would not hear Harmon’s case.
Since World War II, the state and city have adopted a series of rent-control measures. New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, according to news reports, called Monday’s decision “good news. ... Rent regulations are very important to the tenants of New York.”
Since the 1920s, the high court had upheld city zoning laws as reasonable regulations of property, even though they can be costly to land owners. In 1992, the court ruled for a developer who was told he could not build on two beachfront lots. But the justices have stressed that an unconstitutional “taking” of private property is limited to situations where the owner is deprived of all use of his land.
National News
Supreme Court disappoints landlords, rejects rent-control challenge
- National News
-
-
Reputed Mafioso tip triggers new Hoffa body search
The FBI saw enough merit in a reputed Mafia captain’s tip to once again break out the digging equipment to search for the remains of former Teamsters union leader Jimmy Hoffa, last seen alive before a lunch meeting with two mobsters nearly 40 years ago.
-
Utah man shot in church upgraded to fair condition
It was a quiet part of the Father’s Day Mass as about 300 people stood up in preparation for communion.
-
Chrysler expected to formally refuse Jeep recall
In one of the biggest-ever showdowns between an automaker and the government, Chrysler on Tuesday is expected to file papers explaining its refusal to recall 2.7 million older Jeep SUVs that are at risk of catching fire in rear-end collisions.
-
House committee takes up tough immigration bill
A key committee in the Republican-led House moved Tuesday toward approving a tough enforcement-focused immigration bill, over objections from Democrats and disruptions from protesters shouting “Shame, shame, shame!”
-
Hitchhiking cat ’Mata Hairi’ headed home to Oregon
A well-traveled cat named “Mata Hairi” will soon be reunited with her owner after spending nearly 10 months traveling thousands of miles with a hitchhiker who rescued her from the rain.
-
For young immigrants, a delayed coming of age
As a child, Jorge Tume used to sit and do homework as his parents cleaned the desks and floors of a concrete company in Miami. When he was done, he’d take out the trash and help finish cleaning.
-
Court: Arizona citizenship proof law illegal
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that states cannot on their own require would-be voters to prove they are U.S. citizens before using a federal registration system designed to make signing up easier.
-
Fracking fuels water fights in nation’s dry spots
The latest domestic energy boom is sweeping through some of the nation’s driest pockets, drawing millions of gallons of water to unlock oil and gas reserves from beneath the Earth’s surface.
-
Ten more homes destroyed in Colorado wildfire
Firefighters were finally gaining some ground Friday on a wildfire in which two people were killed as they tried to escape and 389 homes were destroyed.
-
House passes sweeping $638 billion defense bill
The House overwhelmingly passed a sweeping, $638 billion defense bill on Friday that imposes new punishments on members of the armed services found guilty of rape or sexual assault as outrage over the crisis in the military has galvanized Congress.
- More National News Headlines
-




