Sat, Nov 07 2009
|
|
Published September 22, 2007 11:43 pm - TOPEKA, Kan. — A proposal to build a $200 million ethanol plant in Shawnee County met stiff resistance at a public hearing, where nearly all of the 29 speakers opposed the plan. Kansas: Planned ethanol plant generates public resistance The Associated Press
TOPEKA, Kan. — A proposal to build a $200 million ethanol plant in Shawnee County met stiff resistance at a public hearing, where nearly all of the 29 speakers opposed the plan. About 150 people attended a public hearing Friday evening on whether the state should grant an air permit to Emerald Renewable Energy, a subsidiary of Cargill, which wants to build the plant on a 300-acre site in northwest Shawnee County. Opponents said the ethanol plant would create pollution, use too much water and hurt a nearby residential area. One supporter said the plant would meet or exceed government safety regulations and would have special devices to restrict odor. Representatives of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment said the state would provide written response to the speakers’ questions but did not say when a decision on the air permit might be made. Mick Mines, a representative of Emerald Renewable Energy, met with opponents before the public hearing. He said the proposed ethanol plant would release 300 to 400 tons of emissions per year, noting that most cars emit about 6 tons of pollutants per year. The proposed plant would produce 100 million gallons of ethanol per year and 330,000 tons of distillery grains, he said, using 1.2 million gallons of water per day, most of it for the cooling towers. Mines also said the plant would employ about 40 people. The Joint Economic Development Organization has already offered Emerald Renewable $290,000 in incentives, $50,000 in land acquisition options and has offered an incentive of $5,714 per job created. Mines acknowledged that the ethanol-making process produces an odor, but said thermal oxidizers at the plant will break down odor-producing compounds. But Sean Teel, a member of Rural Water District No. 2, said at the public hearing that he was concerned the plant and its emissions could hurt water quality in the area. “It stinks,” Teel said. “It’s going to be detrimental to our health.” Sherril Boyer said the plant would be within sight of the official residence of Gov. Kathleen Sebelius. “I can’t imagine her having her parties (with visiting dignitaries) in her backyard with these odors,” Boyer said. Paul Meierhenry said he supported the ethanol plant and argued that the water used by the ethanol plant would equal water used by five center pivot irrigation systems. “It’s not going to ruin your water supply,” he said. 
•
Click to discuss this story with other readers on our forums.
More from the State News section
Missouri: Conservation Commission picks new director Missouri: Years later, fear about pollutants prompts retesting Kansas: Group cuts revenue forecast by $235 million Oklahoma: Group divided on workers’ comp privatization Missouri: Officials debate ways to handle drunken driving cases |
Print this story
E-mail this story
Post to del.icio.us
Discuss this story
 |
 |
: Special Offer For New Subscribers
:
 |
||||||||
|
||||||||
 |
|
|
Published by Newspaper Holding, Inc. 117 East Fourth Street, Joplin, MO 64801 Using our site is your agreement to the terms and conditions. News: news@joplinglobe.com • (417)623-3480 Advertise with the Joplin Globe Copyright © 2006 The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO All rights reserved. 
|
Popular Business directory links - Joplin Apartments | Joplin Attorneys | Joplin Auto Dealers | Joplin Auto Parts | Joplin Auto Repair | Joplin Beauty Salons | Joplin Car Rental | Joplin Dentists | Joplin Doctors | Joplin Flowers | Joplin Hotels | Joplin Insurance | Joplin Loans | Joplin Mortgages | Joplin Movers | Joplin Pizza | Joplin Realtors | Joplin Restaurants | Joplin Storage | Joplin Tax Preparation | Joplin Travel | Joplin Featured | More...
|
|
Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc. • CNHI Classified Advertising Network • CNHI News Service |
