The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Top Stories

February 5, 2013

Residents besieged by light, noise, safety issues they say new interchange creates

JOPLIN, Mo. — Steve and Jennifer Davis used to watch sunsets from the back deck of their home.

They enjoyed the privacy that a stand of timber created at the edge of their backyard.

“That’s one of the main reasons we bought this house,” said Jennifer Davis, 2718 N. Missouri Ave.

Now the couple see headlights instead of sunsets. Their elevated deck overlooks a bridge ramp and a drainage ditch that abuts their backyard. They no longer see their own yard as a safe place for their young children to play.

They live next to the $17 million interchange under construction at North Main and Zora streets. The purpose of the interchange is to span Main Street and an adjacent rail line to increase safety by eliminating the train crossing on Veterans Way. The interchange also will eventually link Highway 249 to the west side of Joplin or a future west bypass.

Residents of the neighborhood have asked the city of Joplin for its help in trying to reduce the problems they are experiencing with the encroachment of the interchange.

Fifteen of them met Sunday with Jack Schaller, the city’s assistant public works director. Their appointed spokeswoman, Linda Lawrence, 2806 N. Missouri Ave., also told the City Council about the problems during a meeting Monday night.

“We feel as homeowners and taxpayers we have been deprived of peace, serenity, privacy and safety by the Zora and Main Street bypass,” Lawrence told the council. “In order to restore our privacy, serenity and safety to an acceptable level, we are requesting a noise and safety barrier behind our homes.”

Lawrence told the Globe that safety is a key concern. She said the ramps on the northeast corner of the intersection run so close to the homes of the Davises and others that the neighborhood’s residents fear a careening vehicle might smash into their yards, or worse, their houses.

Additionally, she said, “The noise is horrendous” now that there is no barrier between the houses and the intersection. There is increased traffic noise, and the sound and vibration from passing trains on the railroad line on the west side of Main Street have become a nuisance.

“It is actually to the point the houses feel like they are shaking” when a train passes, she said.

Headlight glare is another issue since the neighborhood’s natural barrier is gone. “Some neighbors say the lights come into their bedrooms at night and they cannot sleep,” Lawrence said.

Residents met last spring with representatives of the city and the Missouri Department of Transportation. They were told there were no plans to provide any safety or noise and light barriers for the neighborhood.

“This demonstrates an unacceptable level of understanding of our residents’ intrusion of traffic noise, light and danger on the ramp at the rear of our homes,” Lawrence told the council.

The Davises wrote in a letter to the council that “the off-ramp from North Main Street was graded at an angle that will put all vehicle headlights on our home.” They said the problems created by the project have ruined their enjoyment of their home.

Jennifer Davis said she and her husband bought their house in 2010, moving here from Chicago. They were not told anything about the project when they were considering the home’s purchase, even though the city had unveiled design plans for the interchange in 2009. The city had notified the property owners at the time that the project was in the works, but that information was not disclosed to the Davises when they bought the house, she said.

Davis said her neighbors, who were aware of the project, “didn’t have a clear understanding of what they would be doing,” and didn’t realize that the work would bring the road so close to their houses.

City Manager Mark Rohr told the council on Monday night that the city is trying to determine what can be done to abate the problems the residents are experiencing as a result of the project. He said the city will ask MoDOT to help provide a remedy because part of the land involves MoDOT right of way. The city will look at options including the construction of some type of screen or wall between the interchange and Missouri Avenue.

Dan Salisbury, assistant director for MoDOT’s southwest district, said: “We talked to the city staff about that. A longer term solution is to plant some trees. I think both of us understand it’s something we can do, and it’s more of ‘How do we do it?’ at this point,” referring to the collaboration to bring relief to the troubled neighborhood.

Sales tax

THE INTERCHANGE is one of the projects the city linked to a three-eighths-cent capital improvements sales tax approved by voters in August 2004. About $2 million was spent on buying right of way for the project. The city paid $850,000 for one tract of land where the northeast exit ramp was built that has affected the neighborhood on North Missouri Avenue.

1
Text Only
Top Stories
  • 080114 Older worker1_72.jpg Co-workers, friends honor nurse with 50-year career

    Wilma Massey has worked a half century in health care and, even at the age of 74, she’s the first to arrive at work each morning.

    August 1, 2014 2 Photos

  • Scott Branden Smith 080114.jpg Comatose assault victim dies

    A Joplin man left in a coma from an apparent assault died this afternoon at Freeman Hospital West.

    August 1, 2014 1 Photo

  • Amendment 7 backers tout safety, new jobs; foes say special interests to benefit

    Billions of dollars are on the line when Missouri voters head to the polls on Tuesday to consider Amendment 7.
    The constitutional amendment, sent to the voters by the Legislature this year, would temporarily increase Missouri’s sales tax by three-quarters of 1 percent, raising an estimated $5.4 billion for the next decade to fund transportation projects. That includes more than $114.1 million in state funds for projects in Newton and Jasper counties, on top of additional revenue for localities that would be raised.
    After the Missouri Department of Transportation downsized in recent years, these projects are now mostly designed and built by private engineers, contractors and laborers — many of whom have contributed tens of thousands of dollars to a campaign effort to sway voters to support the measure.
    Last Monday — eight days ahead of the primary election day — supporters of the measure reported having raised more than $4.1 million for a campaign committee called Missourians For Safe Transportation and New Jobs, which was established last fall to support the measure.
    The International Union of Operating Engineers in St. Louis and Kansas City have contributed nearly $250,000 to the effort. That total was dwarfed by the $649,398 put in by the Industry Advancement Fund Heavy Constructors. Between its Missouri and Kansas companies, APAC — a construction contracting company that specializes in transportation projects — has contributed more than $150,000.
    “The whole idea that money is flowing into the campaign, of course it is,” said Sen. John Lamping, a St. Louis Republican who is opposed to the measure. “It would be a smart business decision to do that.”
    Lamping said the money pouring into the campaign supporting Amendment 7 is indicative of the financial gain the measure bodes for contractors and laborers.  
    Lamping proposed a measure in the Legislature that would redirect one-eighth of existing sales and use tax revenue directly to transportation projects, but he said that measure was rejected by legislative leaders. The coalition “didn’t hear about it,” the outgoing senator said, “because it was my idea instead of someone else’s idea.”
    Lamping, who filibustered a similar measure in 2013, said Republicans have an ideological consistency problem on the issue. He pointed to the Legislature passing a sales tax increase only a few weeks after overriding Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon’s veto of an income tax cut that will largely help businesses organized as limited liability corporations, like many of the companies that could benefit from the measure. Lamping said that the tax increase will mostly affect taxpayers who did not get a significant tax cut.
    “Who wants a tax cut in Missouri?” he said. “Businesses. (Republican leaders) wanted to make them happy and then they passed a tax cut. This is grand-scale special interest cronyism.”
    The ad campaign being funded mostly by the business interests features paramedics and construction workers claiming the measure would “fix our roads and keep Missouri families safe.”
    “We have a chance to give our highways and bridges the repairs they need,” says one ad, which is running in Joplin and statewide in the lead up to Tuesday’s vote. “We have a chance to fix what’s broken by voting yes on Amendment 7.”
    The commercial uses a lot of words to talk about the benefits of the measure, but two words in particular are noticeably absent from the commercial: “Tax increase.”  
    “The ads don’t mention any of the ballot language,” said Jewell Patek, a spokesman for Missourians For Safe Transportation and New Jobs. “We figure Missourians will see the language when they go to the polls.”
    Patek, a former state representative who now lobbies the Legislature, said he disagreed with Lamping’s notion that Amendment 7 is all about special interest gain.
    “There’s quite a bit to gain for Missourians,” he said. “We have serious road needs. We’ll win or lose by the benefits in Amendment 7. I’m not sure I agree with Senator Lamping’s assessment.”
    If approved, Amendment 7 would prevent an increase in the state’s fuel tax, a funding boost opponents of the amendment like Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon and some of the state’s social welfare groups have said would be more appropriate because it could pull in revenue from people who use the roads — like the state’s trucking industry.
    The Missouri Truckers Association’s political action committee has contributed more than $27,000 to the effort to pass the measure. Tom Crawford, president of the association, said his members support the amendment because they see the problems on the road and deal with them every day. And passage of the measure does not mean anyone will stop paying fuel tax.
    “We overpay our fair share on the fuel tax,” he said, pointing to statistics by the American Transportation Research Institute that show truckers have accounted for about 14 percent of road usage while paying for 39 percent of all taxes and fees owed by motorists. “We pay sales taxes just like everybody does on goods and products that people buy in the stores.”
    Crawford said truck companies do not pay state sales taxes on the purchase of trucks, but they do pay a federal tax. “So, we won’t be impacted on new equipment purchase, but other areas of our business will be impacted just like every other taxpayer in the state will,” he said.
    Thomas Shrout, who is helping lead the campaign against the tax hike, said that is not good enough and that Amendment 7 lets truck drivers off the hook. “Under Amendment 7, they wouldn’t have to pay any more,” he said.
    Shrout’s opposition campaign has raised just over $27,000 — less than 1 percent of the total money raised by its supporters. They are targeting their opposition at the state’s urban core by spending money on direct mail and targeted robocalls in the final week.
    “We think using the sales tax to fund road projects is poor policy for the state of Missouri,” he said. “It should be rejected.”
    Shrout said the Missouri Department of Transportation and its supporters should go back to the drawing board and consider some of the other options like campaigning for toll roads or a gas tax increase — both based on road usage.
    Representatives for APAC and the Heavy Constructors Association declined requests for comment.

    Tuesday’s election
    Amendment 7 is one of five measures voters will consider when they head to the polls on Tuesday. Statewide, local election officials reported to the Missouri secretary of state that it was their estimate that about 27 percent of the state’s 4.06 million registered voters will show up to vote, including 25 percent of registered voters in Jasper County and 30 percent in Newton County.

    August 1, 2014

  • Brownback names 3 Kansas Board of Regents members

    Gov. Sam Brownback on Friday named a former veteran Kansas House member and two attorneys to the board overseeing the state’s higher education system.

    August 1, 2014

  • Fair to feature goats, chickens and decorated bras

    Along with the usual fair sights, sounds and smells — livestock, poultry, produce and the like — there will be something a bit unusual at the Cherokee County American Legion Free Fair this year: Decorated brassieres. And pink. Lots of pink.

    August 1, 2014

  • Grant to fund solar energy system for PSU’s Plaster Center

    An $80,000 grant from Westar Energy will fund solar panels to provide both energy and education at the Robert W. Plaster Center, now under construction at Pittsburg State University.

    August 1, 2014

  • Detour in Parsons for bridge work begins

    A portion of south U.S. 59 Highway will close at the Parsons, Kansas, city limits on Aug. 4 for drainage work, asphalt resurfacing and a bridge deck repair project.

    August 1, 2014

  • Autism center to break ground on future home

    Ground will be broken Tuesday morning for the future home of the Bill & Virginia  Leffen Center for Autism at 2808 S. Picher Ave.

    August 1, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: Home runs for area

    Baseball fans, there’s something exciting going on today that has nothing to do with the major leagues.

    August 1, 2014 1 Photo

  • LIVE BLOG: Little League Regional Tournament

    Athletes and parents from Joplin and Frontenac are headed to Indianapolis for the Little League Central Region Tournament. Follow their progress here.

    August 1, 2014