The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Top Stories

March 29, 2013

MSSU committee to study, manage shared governance on campus

JOPLIN, Mo. — A newly formed permanent committee of administrators, faculty, staff and students is taking a hard look at how shared governance works — or doesn’t work — at Missouri Southern State University.

The 13 committee members representing all facets of the university met in an organizational session Friday for their first discussion of shared governance, which was established on the principles of transparent communication, accountability, and informed and engaged decision-making.

The committee will be responsible for reviewing the philosophy, goals, principles and framework of shared governance; reviewing and analyzing shared governance surveys, and reporting results to the campus; ensuring that all committee reports are posted; and making recommendations to maintain open channels of communication, according to a statement from Sherry Buchanan, chairwoman of the Board of Governors.

Some members of the committee told the board earlier this month that they still see communication issues on campus, but that they sought to change that.

Molly Shumaker, a student representative, said many MSSU students don’t feel as though they have a voice on campus.

“This committee, I see it as a way to show the other students that we are interested in what they have to say, and I hope to bring the general consensus (of students) so maybe you know where we’re coming from,” she said.

Aaron Lewis, a representative of the faculty senate, said he hopes the committee will help keep open communication between the campus and its administration.

“It’s pretty clear that sometimes the lines of communication get mixed up,” he said. “People want to know what’s going on, and when they feel like maybe they’re being neglected, they start wondering what’s going on with their job situation or with their campus family.”

Olive Talley, representing secretarial staff, said the committee would have to “foster some kind of trust” with other campus organizations to ensure a fluid flow of information. She said it would also have to enforce policies already in place, such as posting information to the campus Intranet system and ensuring that it’s up to date.

Steve Jordan, who represents the physical plant staff, said he thinks part of the committee’s goal should be to clearly define shared governance.

“I think one of our biggest problems is getting people to actually understand what shared governance is and what is everyone’s role,” he said.

That was a comment echoed by Pat Lipira, vice president for academic affairs, who asked for clarity on individual roles in the university’s decision-making steps.

“Truly, I don’t know sometimes when does a decision go through the board and when does it not go through the board,” she said. “Honestly I’m not clear sometimes on what is the protocol and who is involved.”

MSSU President Bruce Speck said the committee will meet at least three times per semester, and members will serve four-year terms. He said shared governance would be successful if those who sit on the committee report back to and engage the campus communities that they represent.

“It’s really going to be incumbent upon you to make sure you’re going back to the people you’re representing and sharing those issues,” he told members of the committee earlier this month.

The directive for implementing shared governance at MSSU came from the Higher Learning Commission, an organization that oversees the accreditation of degree-granting colleges and universities.

A task force formed in 2008 was charged with strengthening the university’s framework, policies and procedures for shared governance. But issues with its implementation appeared to remain, and were sometimes linked to some of the controversies that have plagued the university.

Faculty complaints leveled against Speck in fall 2009 included assertions of breaches of shared governance, and the faculty later delivered a no-confidence vote against the president that was driven, in part, by accusations of poor communication and the withholding of information.

Surveys that were administered on campus reported that 68 percent of responding faculty members in 2009 and 70 percent of responding faculty members in 2010 were either “dissatisfied” or “very dissatisfied” with the level of shared governance for the faculty and staff.

A 2011 follow-up visit by representatives of the Higher Learning Commission noted progress in shared governance, and MSSU officials credited that to listening sessions, economic summits and increased meetings between faculty senators and administrators. Yet the results of another survey of faculty last year found that an overwhelming majority of respondents disagreed that the president and the board communicate effectively, and suggested that neither seeks faculty input on decisions.

Committee chairman

Brian Fronzaglia, an assistant professor in the music department and a representative of the faculty senate, was elected chairman of the new permanent shared governance committee at Missouri Southern State University.

Text Only
Top Stories
  • 080114 Older worker1_72.jpg Co-workers, friends honor nurse with 50-year career

    Wilma Massey has worked a half century in health care and, even at the age of 74, she’s the first to arrive at work each morning.

    August 1, 2014 2 Photos

  • Scott Branden Smith 080114.jpg Comatose assault victim dies

    A Joplin man left in a coma from an apparent assault died this afternoon at Freeman Hospital West.

    August 1, 2014 1 Photo

  • Amendment 7 backers tout safety, new jobs; foes say special interests to benefit

    Billions of dollars are on the line when Missouri voters head to the polls on Tuesday to consider Amendment 7.
    The constitutional amendment, sent to the voters by the Legislature this year, would temporarily increase Missouri’s sales tax by three-quarters of 1 percent, raising an estimated $5.4 billion for the next decade to fund transportation projects. That includes more than $114.1 million in state funds for projects in Newton and Jasper counties, on top of additional revenue for localities that would be raised.
    After the Missouri Department of Transportation downsized in recent years, these projects are now mostly designed and built by private engineers, contractors and laborers — many of whom have contributed tens of thousands of dollars to a campaign effort to sway voters to support the measure.
    Last Monday — eight days ahead of the primary election day — supporters of the measure reported having raised more than $4.1 million for a campaign committee called Missourians For Safe Transportation and New Jobs, which was established last fall to support the measure.
    The International Union of Operating Engineers in St. Louis and Kansas City have contributed nearly $250,000 to the effort. That total was dwarfed by the $649,398 put in by the Industry Advancement Fund Heavy Constructors. Between its Missouri and Kansas companies, APAC — a construction contracting company that specializes in transportation projects — has contributed more than $150,000.
    “The whole idea that money is flowing into the campaign, of course it is,” said Sen. John Lamping, a St. Louis Republican who is opposed to the measure. “It would be a smart business decision to do that.”
    Lamping said the money pouring into the campaign supporting Amendment 7 is indicative of the financial gain the measure bodes for contractors and laborers.  
    Lamping proposed a measure in the Legislature that would redirect one-eighth of existing sales and use tax revenue directly to transportation projects, but he said that measure was rejected by legislative leaders. The coalition “didn’t hear about it,” the outgoing senator said, “because it was my idea instead of someone else’s idea.”
    Lamping, who filibustered a similar measure in 2013, said Republicans have an ideological consistency problem on the issue. He pointed to the Legislature passing a sales tax increase only a few weeks after overriding Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon’s veto of an income tax cut that will largely help businesses organized as limited liability corporations, like many of the companies that could benefit from the measure. Lamping said that the tax increase will mostly affect taxpayers who did not get a significant tax cut.
    “Who wants a tax cut in Missouri?” he said. “Businesses. (Republican leaders) wanted to make them happy and then they passed a tax cut. This is grand-scale special interest cronyism.”
    The ad campaign being funded mostly by the business interests features paramedics and construction workers claiming the measure would “fix our roads and keep Missouri families safe.”
    “We have a chance to give our highways and bridges the repairs they need,” says one ad, which is running in Joplin and statewide in the lead up to Tuesday’s vote. “We have a chance to fix what’s broken by voting yes on Amendment 7.”
    The commercial uses a lot of words to talk about the benefits of the measure, but two words in particular are noticeably absent from the commercial: “Tax increase.”  
    “The ads don’t mention any of the ballot language,” said Jewell Patek, a spokesman for Missourians For Safe Transportation and New Jobs. “We figure Missourians will see the language when they go to the polls.”
    Patek, a former state representative who now lobbies the Legislature, said he disagreed with Lamping’s notion that Amendment 7 is all about special interest gain.
    “There’s quite a bit to gain for Missourians,” he said. “We have serious road needs. We’ll win or lose by the benefits in Amendment 7. I’m not sure I agree with Senator Lamping’s assessment.”
    If approved, Amendment 7 would prevent an increase in the state’s fuel tax, a funding boost opponents of the amendment like Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon and some of the state’s social welfare groups have said would be more appropriate because it could pull in revenue from people who use the roads — like the state’s trucking industry.
    The Missouri Truckers Association’s political action committee has contributed more than $27,000 to the effort to pass the measure. Tom Crawford, president of the association, said his members support the amendment because they see the problems on the road and deal with them every day. And passage of the measure does not mean anyone will stop paying fuel tax.
    “We overpay our fair share on the fuel tax,” he said, pointing to statistics by the American Transportation Research Institute that show truckers have accounted for about 14 percent of road usage while paying for 39 percent of all taxes and fees owed by motorists. “We pay sales taxes just like everybody does on goods and products that people buy in the stores.”
    Crawford said truck companies do not pay state sales taxes on the purchase of trucks, but they do pay a federal tax. “So, we won’t be impacted on new equipment purchase, but other areas of our business will be impacted just like every other taxpayer in the state will,” he said.
    Thomas Shrout, who is helping lead the campaign against the tax hike, said that is not good enough and that Amendment 7 lets truck drivers off the hook. “Under Amendment 7, they wouldn’t have to pay any more,” he said.
    Shrout’s opposition campaign has raised just over $27,000 — less than 1 percent of the total money raised by its supporters. They are targeting their opposition at the state’s urban core by spending money on direct mail and targeted robocalls in the final week.
    “We think using the sales tax to fund road projects is poor policy for the state of Missouri,” he said. “It should be rejected.”
    Shrout said the Missouri Department of Transportation and its supporters should go back to the drawing board and consider some of the other options like campaigning for toll roads or a gas tax increase — both based on road usage.
    Representatives for APAC and the Heavy Constructors Association declined requests for comment.

    Tuesday’s election
    Amendment 7 is one of five measures voters will consider when they head to the polls on Tuesday. Statewide, local election officials reported to the Missouri secretary of state that it was their estimate that about 27 percent of the state’s 4.06 million registered voters will show up to vote, including 25 percent of registered voters in Jasper County and 30 percent in Newton County.

    August 1, 2014

  • Brownback names 3 Kansas Board of Regents members

    Gov. Sam Brownback on Friday named a former veteran Kansas House member and two attorneys to the board overseeing the state’s higher education system.

    August 1, 2014

  • Fair to feature goats, chickens and decorated bras

    Along with the usual fair sights, sounds and smells — livestock, poultry, produce and the like — there will be something a bit unusual at the Cherokee County American Legion Free Fair this year: Decorated brassieres. And pink. Lots of pink.

    August 1, 2014

  • Grant to fund solar energy system for PSU’s Plaster Center

    An $80,000 grant from Westar Energy will fund solar panels to provide both energy and education at the Robert W. Plaster Center, now under construction at Pittsburg State University.

    August 1, 2014

  • Detour in Parsons for bridge work begins

    A portion of south U.S. 59 Highway will close at the Parsons, Kansas, city limits on Aug. 4 for drainage work, asphalt resurfacing and a bridge deck repair project.

    August 1, 2014

  • Autism center to break ground on future home

    Ground will be broken Tuesday morning for the future home of the Bill & Virginia  Leffen Center for Autism at 2808 S. Picher Ave.

    August 1, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: Home runs for area

    Baseball fans, there’s something exciting going on today that has nothing to do with the major leagues.

    August 1, 2014 1 Photo

  • LIVE BLOG: Little League Regional Tournament

    Athletes and parents from Joplin and Frontenac are headed to Indianapolis for the Little League Central Region Tournament. Follow their progress here.

    August 1, 2014