The Joplin Globe, Joplin, MO

Top Stories

July 28, 2013

Tax-cut legislation becomes divisive as GOP organizes to override veto

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Lawmakers from the Joplin area say they will support the effort to override the governor’s veto of legislation that would reduce income taxes for individuals and corporations.

The attempt is setting up to be a close call.

The legislation — House Bill 253 — would reduce taxes by half a percent for all Missourians over the next decade, and by 2017 it would allow individuals to deduct 50 percent of business income. It also would reduce corporate income taxes by 3 percent over the next decade.

While some business interests favor the legislation, other groups, including those representing public schools, are calling on legislators to support the governor.

Gov. Jay Nixon last week brought out numbers put together by the Missouri Association of School Administrators detailing a scenario in which schools could lose revenue as taxes fall. The association opposes HB 253, claiming between $260 million and $450 million in cuts to K-12 education would be necessary if the veto is overridden and income taxes are cut.

For Southwest Missouri schools, that could mean millions in cuts.

According to Nixon’s office, the Joplin School District could face a cut between $1.64 million and $2.83 million, with similar cuts projected for the Neosho, Webb City and Carthage districts.

C.J. Huff, Joplin superintendent, said cuts even on the low end of that estimate could be disastrous for the district.

“Having something like this hit us from left field, I can’t even describe the impact. It would be devastating,” Huff said. He said between 65 and 70 percent of the district’s budget is spent on staffing, even after efforts to “go lean” in recent years.

But state Rep. Tom Flanigan, R-Carthage, vice chairman of the House Budget Committee, said the state’s fiscal “world would have to blow up” in order for the potential result the Nixon administration is citing to come true.

“It is crazy you’re going to worry about something that is ‘potential,’ ‘could be,’ ‘may,’ and they’re throwing those words out like this is already happening or is in the process of happening,” he said.

“The thing about (House Bill) 253 is there are a lot of moving parts, and the governor likes to scare people with moving parts. He scared every school administrator with these numbers from MASA’s (Missouri Association of School Administrators) own website.”

Huff acknowledged that there are “a lot of unknowns” for school districts, but he said he and other Missouri school administrators are acting based on the projections they have in front of them right now.

“This is not a time in our state’s history to be experimenting with policies that could significantly damage, if not completely devastate, schools and others that would be impacted by the potential this would not work,” Huff said.

The General Assembly’s own numbers presume that state revenues could be reduced by at least $700 million annually when the bill is fully implemented over 10 years, while the immediate cost would be smaller. Under the bill, tax rates would not be reduced unless the state had revenue growth of $100 million each year.

Nixon has said he believes the annual cost would be higher and could hit as much as $1.2 billion. He said lawmakers have a clear choice as they consider whether to override his veto during their session in September.

“As these numbers make clear,” he said last week, “lawmakers can either support House Bill 253 or they can support public education, but they can’t do both.”

While House Republicans have not officially decided whether they will seek a veto override, Nixon’s aggressive public push against the bill faced some of its first concerted resistance last week by legislative leaders. House Budget Committee Chairman Rick Stream, R-St. Louis, wrote in a memo to colleagues that with Missouri revenues up, and with a projected $150 million surplus, he believes the cost of the tax cut would be covered for the first two years.

“HB 253 is not perfect, and there are probably some things that will need to be fixed when we come back in January, but the fear mongering coming out of the executive branch has gone too far,” he said. “I believe the governor philosophically disagrees with us on lower taxes and is throwing a tantrum to get his way.”

Southwest Missouri representatives — all Republicans — including Flanigan, Charlie Davis, Mike Kelley, Bill Lant, Bill Reiboldt and Bill White, were among the members who supported the original bill, and none of them has changed his mind at this point.

Still, it is unclear whether the bill’s supporters have enough votes to override Nixon’s veto. The original bill had support in the House from 100 Republicans and three Democrats — six votes short of the constitutional requirement of 109 votes needed to override a veto. Three Republicans and 48 Democrats opposed the bill. An override attempt also would need two-thirds support in the Senate.

One of the earlier Republican supporters, Rep. Nate Walker, of the Kirksville area, has indicated he has become undecided about the bill, and a handful of the original “aye” votes have begun to join him. And two of the three Democratic representatives who originally voted for the bill — Steve Hodges, of East Prairie, and Ed Schieffer, of Troy — have said they will not vote to override Nixon’s veto. The third previously supportive Democrat — Jeff Roorda, of Barnhart — has said he now is undecided.

Flanigan said overriding Nixon’s veto will be a “struggle” for Republicans because members are “an autonomous group of people, and everyone is not just going to press the ‘yes’ button.”

Across the state, St. Louis area investor and GOP donor Rex Sinquefield has put up $2.35 million to fund a commercial and lobbying campaign to pressure holdouts to support the legislation. His effort, called Grow Missouri, includes a statewide television and radio ad campaign, as well as a lobbying effort. The group specifically highlights the so-called economic “border war” between Kansas and Missouri, which is most intense in the Kansas City area, where some businesses have moved to Kansas because of a more favorable tax climate.

“The more Missourians find out about this, that the state Legislature decided that when state revenues were increasing they were going to return some of that money, people really resonate with that,” said Aaron Willard, treasurer of Grow Missouri.

Nixon is expected to continue his own public offensive this week with stops today(Monday) in St. Louis and Kansas City.

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS contributed to this report.



Nixon vetoes

DEMOCRATIC GOV. JAY NIXON vetoed more of the bills passed by Missouri’s Republican-led Legislature this year than in any of his four previous years in office. He spiked 29 of the 145 non-budgetary bills sent to his desk — a 20 percent rejection rate.

1
Text Only
Top Stories
  • 080114 Older worker1_72.jpg Co-workers, friends honor nurse with 50-year career

    Wilma Massey has worked a half century in health care and, even at the age of 74, she’s the first to arrive at work each morning.

    August 1, 2014 2 Photos

  • Scott Branden Smith 080114.jpg Comatose assault victim dies

    A Joplin man left in a coma from an apparent assault died this afternoon at Freeman Hospital West.

    August 1, 2014 1 Photo

  • Amendment 7 backers tout safety, new jobs; foes say special interests to benefit

    Billions of dollars are on the line when Missouri voters head to the polls on Tuesday to consider Amendment 7.
    The constitutional amendment, sent to the voters by the Legislature this year, would temporarily increase Missouri’s sales tax by three-quarters of 1 percent, raising an estimated $5.4 billion for the next decade to fund transportation projects. That includes more than $114.1 million in state funds for projects in Newton and Jasper counties, on top of additional revenue for localities that would be raised.
    After the Missouri Department of Transportation downsized in recent years, these projects are now mostly designed and built by private engineers, contractors and laborers — many of whom have contributed tens of thousands of dollars to a campaign effort to sway voters to support the measure.
    Last Monday — eight days ahead of the primary election day — supporters of the measure reported having raised more than $4.1 million for a campaign committee called Missourians For Safe Transportation and New Jobs, which was established last fall to support the measure.
    The International Union of Operating Engineers in St. Louis and Kansas City have contributed nearly $250,000 to the effort. That total was dwarfed by the $649,398 put in by the Industry Advancement Fund Heavy Constructors. Between its Missouri and Kansas companies, APAC — a construction contracting company that specializes in transportation projects — has contributed more than $150,000.
    “The whole idea that money is flowing into the campaign, of course it is,” said Sen. John Lamping, a St. Louis Republican who is opposed to the measure. “It would be a smart business decision to do that.”
    Lamping said the money pouring into the campaign supporting Amendment 7 is indicative of the financial gain the measure bodes for contractors and laborers.  
    Lamping proposed a measure in the Legislature that would redirect one-eighth of existing sales and use tax revenue directly to transportation projects, but he said that measure was rejected by legislative leaders. The coalition “didn’t hear about it,” the outgoing senator said, “because it was my idea instead of someone else’s idea.”
    Lamping, who filibustered a similar measure in 2013, said Republicans have an ideological consistency problem on the issue. He pointed to the Legislature passing a sales tax increase only a few weeks after overriding Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon’s veto of an income tax cut that will largely help businesses organized as limited liability corporations, like many of the companies that could benefit from the measure. Lamping said that the tax increase will mostly affect taxpayers who did not get a significant tax cut.
    “Who wants a tax cut in Missouri?” he said. “Businesses. (Republican leaders) wanted to make them happy and then they passed a tax cut. This is grand-scale special interest cronyism.”
    The ad campaign being funded mostly by the business interests features paramedics and construction workers claiming the measure would “fix our roads and keep Missouri families safe.”
    “We have a chance to give our highways and bridges the repairs they need,” says one ad, which is running in Joplin and statewide in the lead up to Tuesday’s vote. “We have a chance to fix what’s broken by voting yes on Amendment 7.”
    The commercial uses a lot of words to talk about the benefits of the measure, but two words in particular are noticeably absent from the commercial: “Tax increase.”  
    “The ads don’t mention any of the ballot language,” said Jewell Patek, a spokesman for Missourians For Safe Transportation and New Jobs. “We figure Missourians will see the language when they go to the polls.”
    Patek, a former state representative who now lobbies the Legislature, said he disagreed with Lamping’s notion that Amendment 7 is all about special interest gain.
    “There’s quite a bit to gain for Missourians,” he said. “We have serious road needs. We’ll win or lose by the benefits in Amendment 7. I’m not sure I agree with Senator Lamping’s assessment.”
    If approved, Amendment 7 would prevent an increase in the state’s fuel tax, a funding boost opponents of the amendment like Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon and some of the state’s social welfare groups have said would be more appropriate because it could pull in revenue from people who use the roads — like the state’s trucking industry.
    The Missouri Truckers Association’s political action committee has contributed more than $27,000 to the effort to pass the measure. Tom Crawford, president of the association, said his members support the amendment because they see the problems on the road and deal with them every day. And passage of the measure does not mean anyone will stop paying fuel tax.
    “We overpay our fair share on the fuel tax,” he said, pointing to statistics by the American Transportation Research Institute that show truckers have accounted for about 14 percent of road usage while paying for 39 percent of all taxes and fees owed by motorists. “We pay sales taxes just like everybody does on goods and products that people buy in the stores.”
    Crawford said truck companies do not pay state sales taxes on the purchase of trucks, but they do pay a federal tax. “So, we won’t be impacted on new equipment purchase, but other areas of our business will be impacted just like every other taxpayer in the state will,” he said.
    Thomas Shrout, who is helping lead the campaign against the tax hike, said that is not good enough and that Amendment 7 lets truck drivers off the hook. “Under Amendment 7, they wouldn’t have to pay any more,” he said.
    Shrout’s opposition campaign has raised just over $27,000 — less than 1 percent of the total money raised by its supporters. They are targeting their opposition at the state’s urban core by spending money on direct mail and targeted robocalls in the final week.
    “We think using the sales tax to fund road projects is poor policy for the state of Missouri,” he said. “It should be rejected.”
    Shrout said the Missouri Department of Transportation and its supporters should go back to the drawing board and consider some of the other options like campaigning for toll roads or a gas tax increase — both based on road usage.
    Representatives for APAC and the Heavy Constructors Association declined requests for comment.

    Tuesday’s election
    Amendment 7 is one of five measures voters will consider when they head to the polls on Tuesday. Statewide, local election officials reported to the Missouri secretary of state that it was their estimate that about 27 percent of the state’s 4.06 million registered voters will show up to vote, including 25 percent of registered voters in Jasper County and 30 percent in Newton County.

    August 1, 2014

  • Brownback names 3 Kansas Board of Regents members

    Gov. Sam Brownback on Friday named a former veteran Kansas House member and two attorneys to the board overseeing the state’s higher education system.

    August 1, 2014

  • Fair to feature goats, chickens and decorated bras

    Along with the usual fair sights, sounds and smells — livestock, poultry, produce and the like — there will be something a bit unusual at the Cherokee County American Legion Free Fair this year: Decorated brassieres. And pink. Lots of pink.

    August 1, 2014

  • Grant to fund solar energy system for PSU’s Plaster Center

    An $80,000 grant from Westar Energy will fund solar panels to provide both energy and education at the Robert W. Plaster Center, now under construction at Pittsburg State University.

    August 1, 2014

  • Detour in Parsons for bridge work begins

    A portion of south U.S. 59 Highway will close at the Parsons, Kansas, city limits on Aug. 4 for drainage work, asphalt resurfacing and a bridge deck repair project.

    August 1, 2014

  • Autism center to break ground on future home

    Ground will be broken Tuesday morning for the future home of the Bill & Virginia  Leffen Center for Autism at 2808 S. Picher Ave.

    August 1, 2014

  • Our View.jpg Our View: Home runs for area

    Baseball fans, there’s something exciting going on today that has nothing to do with the major leagues.

    August 1, 2014 1 Photo

  • LIVE BLOG: Little League Regional Tournament

    Athletes and parents from Joplin and Frontenac are headed to Indianapolis for the Little League Central Region Tournament. Follow their progress here.

    August 1, 2014